2005 Land Rover LR3 vs. 1996 Proton 300
To start off, 2005 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 300 would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover LR3 weights approximately 1346 kg more than 1996 Proton 300.
Because 2005 Land Rover LR3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Proton 300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover LR3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Land Rover LR3 | 1996 Proton 300 | |
| Make | Land Rover | Proton |
| Model | LR3 | 300 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4392 cc | 1834 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2461 kg | 1115 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2450 mm |
