2005 Land Rover LR3 vs. 2010 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2010 Jeep Commander is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Land Rover LR3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Land Rover LR3 would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Commander (347 HP) has 47 more horse power than 2005 Land Rover LR3. (300 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2005 Land Rover LR3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover LR3 weights approximately 106 kg more than 2010 Jeep Commander.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jeep Commander (520 Nm) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Land Rover LR3. (427 Nm). This means 2010 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Land Rover LR3.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Land Rover LR3 | 2010 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Land Rover | Jeep |
Model | LR3 | Commander |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4390 cc | 5654 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 347 HP |
Torque | 427 Nm | 520 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 99.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 90.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2461 kg | 2355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 15.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 80 L |