2005 Land Rover LR3 vs. 2010 Scion xB
To start off, 2010 Scion xB is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Land Rover LR3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Land Rover LR3 would be higher. At 4,390 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover LR3 (300 HP) has 142 more horse power than 2010 Scion xB. (158 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 2010 Scion xB.
Because 2005 Land Rover LR3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Scion xB. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover LR3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Land Rover LR3 (427 Nm) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Scion xB. (219 Nm). This means 2005 Land Rover LR3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Scion xB.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Land Rover LR3 | 2010 Scion xB | |
Make | Land Rover | Scion |
Model | LR3 | xB |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4390 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 158 HP |
Torque | 427 Nm | 219 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4249 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 53 L |