2005 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1946 Maserati 6C
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Maserati 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Maserati 6C would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1696 kg more than 1946 Maserati 6C.
Because 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1946 Maserati 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 1946 Maserati 6C has manual transmission. 1946 Maserati 6C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Land Rover Range Rover | 1946 Maserati 6C | |
| Make | Land Rover | Maserati |
| Model | Range Rover | 6C |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1946 |
| Engine Size | 2926 cc | 1493 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 2500 kg | 804 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2560 mm |
