2005 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher.
Because 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Land Rover Range Rover | 1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Land Rover | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Range Rover | Phantom |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1953 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 283 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3690 mm |
