2005 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1953 Talbot Baby
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover (283 HP) has 175 more horse power than 1953 Talbot Baby. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1953 Talbot Baby. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 784 kg more than 1953 Talbot Baby. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Talbot Baby. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Land Rover Range Rover | 1953 Talbot Baby | |
| Make | Land Rover | Talbot |
| Model | Range Rover | Baby |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1953 |
| Engine Size | 4392 cc | 2690 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 283 HP | 108 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2440 kg | 1656 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3130 mm |
