2005 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1962 Sunbeam Alpine
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Sunbeam Alpine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Sunbeam Alpine would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover (283 HP) has 204 more horse power than 1962 Sunbeam Alpine. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1962 Sunbeam Alpine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1445 kg more than 1962 Sunbeam Alpine. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Sunbeam Alpine. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover (441 Nm) has 314 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Sunbeam Alpine. (127 Nm). This means 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Sunbeam Alpine.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Land Rover Range Rover | 1962 Sunbeam Alpine | |
| Make | Land Rover | Sunbeam |
| Model | Range Rover | Alpine |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4392 cc | 1592 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 283 HP | 79 HP |
| Torque | 441 Nm | 127 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 81.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.1:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2440 kg | 995 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2190 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 40 L |
