2005 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1963 Volkswagen 1500
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Volkswagen 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Volkswagen 1500 would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 230 more horse power than 1963 Volkswagen 1500. (52 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1963 Volkswagen 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1580 kg more than 1963 Volkswagen 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Volkswagen 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Land Rover Range Rover | 1963 Volkswagen 1500 | |
Make | Land Rover | Volkswagen |
Model | Range Rover | 1500 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 1493 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2510 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 40 L |