2005 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1964 Renault 8
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Renault 8 would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 235 more horse power than 1964 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1964 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1770 kg more than 1964 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Renault 8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Land Rover Range Rover | 1964 Renault 8 | |
Make | Land Rover | Renault |
Model | Range Rover | 8 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2510 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2280 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 38 L |