2005 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1968 Volkswagen 1600
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Volkswagen 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Volkswagen 1600 would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 233 more horse power than 1968 Volkswagen 1600. (49 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1968 Volkswagen 1600.
Because 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Volkswagen 1600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Land Rover Range Rover | 1968 Volkswagen 1600 | |
Make | Land Rover | Volkswagen |
Model | Range Rover | 1600 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 1584 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 40 L |