2005 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1977 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,748 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 205 kg more than 1977 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow.
Because 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Land Rover Range Rover | 1977 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Land Rover | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Range Rover | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4392 cc | 6748 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 283 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2440 kg | 2235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3050 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 18.1 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 107 L |
