2005 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 830 kg more than 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon.
Because 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Land Rover Range Rover | 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon | |
Make | Land Rover | Mitsubishi |
Model | Range Rover | Space Wagon |
Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4392 cc | 2999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 283 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2440 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2790 mm |