2005 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2006 Holden Epica
To start off, 2006 Holden Epica is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover (175 HP) has 22 more horse power than 2006 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2006 Holden Epica.
Because 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover (390 Nm) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Land Rover Range Rover | 2006 Holden Epica | |
Make | Land Rover | Holden |
Model | Range Rover | Epica |
Year Released | 2005 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2926 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 390 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |