2005 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2008 Nissan Livina
To start off, 2008 Nissan Livina is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 35 kg more than 2008 Nissan Livina.
Because 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Nissan Livina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover (441 Nm) has 288 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan Livina. (153 Nm). This means 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan Livina.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Land Rover Range Rover | 2008 Nissan Livina | |
Make | Land Rover | Nissan |
Model | Range Rover | Livina |
Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4392 cc | 1598 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 283 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 441 Nm | 153 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2440 kg | 2405 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 18.1 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 52 L |