2005 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover (283 HP) has 209 more horse power than 2008 Renault Clio. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2008 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1285 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover (441 Nm) has 336 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (105 Nm). This means 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Land Rover Range Rover | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Land Rover | Renault |
Model | Range Rover | Clio |
Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4392 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 283 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 441 Nm | 105 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 76.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2440 kg | 1155 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 18.1 L/100km | 5.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 55 L |