2005 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2009 Mitsubishi Pajero
To start off, 2009 Mitsubishi Pajero is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover (283 HP) has 120 more horse power than 2009 Mitsubishi Pajero. (163 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2009 Mitsubishi Pajero. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 900 kg more than 2009 Mitsubishi Pajero. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover (441 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mitsubishi Pajero. (373 Nm). This means 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mitsubishi Pajero.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Land Rover Range Rover | 2009 Mitsubishi Pajero | |
Make | Land Rover | Mitsubishi |
Model | Range Rover | Pajero |
Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4392 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 283 HP | 163 HP |
Torque | 441 Nm | 373 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 98.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 105 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 17.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2440 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 18.1 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 88 L |