2005 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover (283 HP) has 135 more horse power than 2010 Holden Cruze. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Because 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden Cruze. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover (441 Nm) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Cruze. (320 Nm). This means 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Land Rover Range Rover | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Land Rover | Holden |
| Model | Range Rover | Cruze |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4392 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 283 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 441 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2685 mm |
