2005 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2010 Mazda 2
To start off, 2010 Mazda 2 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover (283 HP) has 216 more horse power than 2010 Mazda 2. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1111 kg more than 2010 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Mazda 2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover (441 Nm) has 281 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda 2. (160 Nm). This means 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Land Rover Range Rover | 2010 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Land Rover | Mazda |
Model | Range Rover | 2 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4392 cc | 1399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 283 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 441 Nm | 160 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 73.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 18.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2440 kg | 1329 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 18.1 L/100km | 4.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 45 L |