2005 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2012 Acura RDX
To start off, 2012 Acura RDX is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover (283 HP) has 43 more horse power than 2012 Acura RDX. (240 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2012 Acura RDX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 657 kg more than 2012 Acura RDX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover (441 Nm) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Acura RDX. (352 Nm). This means 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Acura RDX.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Land Rover Range Rover | 2012 Acura RDX | |
Make | Land Rover | Acura |
Model | Range Rover | RDX |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4392 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 283 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 441 Nm | 352 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2440 kg | 1783 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4636 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1869 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1654 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2649 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 14.7 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 19.6 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 68 L |