2005 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2012 BMW 320
To start off, 2012 BMW 320 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover (283 HP) has 101 more horse power than 2012 BMW 320. (182 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2012 BMW 320.
Because 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 BMW 320. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover (441 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 BMW 320. (380 Nm). This means 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 BMW 320.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Land Rover Range Rover | 2012 BMW 320 | |
Make | Land Rover | BMW |
Model | Range Rover | 320 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4392 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 283 HP | 182 HP |
Torque | 441 Nm | 380 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 84 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4624 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1811 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1384 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 57 L |