2005 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Tundra (376 HP) has 94 more horse power than 2005 Land Rover Range Rover. (282 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 2005 Land Rover Range Rover. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 136 kg more than 2013 Toyota Tundra.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Tundra (544 Nm) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Land Rover Range Rover. (441 Nm). This means 2013 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Land Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Land Rover Range Rover | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Land Rover | Toyota |
| Model | Range Rover | Tundra |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4392 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 376 HP |
| Torque | 441 Nm | 544 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2440 kg | 2304 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 5329 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1935 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3220 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 14.7 L/100km | 12.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 19.6 L/100km | 16.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 100 L |
