2005 Lexus RX vs. 1965 Pontiac Catalina
To start off, 2005 Lexus RX is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Pontiac Catalina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Pontiac Catalina would be higher. At 6,891 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Pontiac Catalina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Pontiac Catalina (376 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 2005 Lexus RX. (231 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Pontiac Catalina should accelerate faster than 2005 Lexus RX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Pontiac Catalina weights approximately 134 kg more than 2005 Lexus RX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Pontiac Catalina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Pontiac Catalina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Lexus RX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Pontiac Catalina (625 Nm) has 297 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Lexus RX. (328 Nm). This means 1965 Pontiac Catalina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Lexus RX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Lexus RX | 1965 Pontiac Catalina | |
| Make | Lexus | Pontiac |
| Model | RX | Catalina |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3310 cc | 6891 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 231 HP | 376 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 328 Nm | 625 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 103.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 10.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1751 kg | 1885 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 5450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 3080 mm |
