2005 Lexus RX vs. 1994 Rover 800
To start off, 2005 Lexus RX is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 800 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Lexus RX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lexus RX (201 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1994 Rover 800. (167 HP @ 5900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lexus RX should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover 800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lexus RX weights approximately 386 kg more than 1994 Rover 800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lexus RX (283 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover 800. (225 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2005 Lexus RX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover 800.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Lexus RX | 1994 Rover 800 | |
Make | Lexus | Rover |
Model | RX | 800 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1994 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2995 cc | 2675 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 167 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 283 Nm | 225 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 211 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1524 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.2 L/100km | 4.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 68 L |