2005 Lexus RX vs. 2003 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2005 Lexus RX is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 3,310 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Lexus RX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lexus RX (231 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2003 Cadillac CTS. (179 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lexus RX should accelerate faster than 2003 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lexus RX weights approximately 131 kg more than 2003 Cadillac CTS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Lexus RX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lexus RX (328 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Cadillac CTS. (245 Nm). This means 2005 Lexus RX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Lexus RX | 2003 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Lexus | Cadillac |
Model | RX | CTS |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3310 cc | 2597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 231 HP | 179 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 328 Nm | 245 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 83.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 79.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 10.2:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1751 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 73 L | 64 L |