2005 Lexus RX vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Lexus RX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Lexus RX would be higher. At 3,310 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Lexus RX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lexus RX weights approximately 696 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lexus RX (328 Nm) has 201 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (127 Nm). This means 2005 Lexus RX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Lexus RX | 2008 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Lexus | Renault |
| Model | RX | Clio |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 3310 cc | 1390 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 231 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 328 Nm | 127 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 79.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 70 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1751 kg | 1055 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2480 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 6.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 73 L | 50 L |
