2005 Lexus RX vs. 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Lexus RX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Lexus RX would be higher. At 3,310 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Lexus RX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lexus RX (230 HP) has 43 more horse power than 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (187 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lexus RX should accelerate faster than 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lexus RX (328 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (320 Nm). This means 2005 Lexus RX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Lexus RX | 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Lexus | Jeep |
Model | RX | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3310 cc | 2987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 187 HP |
Torque | 328 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1958 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1755 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2916 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 73 L | 80 L |