2005 Lexus RX vs. 2013 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Lexus RX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Lexus RX would be higher. At 3,310 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Lexus RX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XF (335 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 2005 Lexus RX. (230 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2005 Lexus RX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XF weights approximately 158 kg more than 2005 Lexus RX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XF (340 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Lexus RX. (328 Nm). This means 2013 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Lexus RX.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Lexus RX | 2013 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Lexus | Jaguar |
Model | RX | XF |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3310 cc | 2995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 335 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 328 Nm | 340 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1844 kg | 2002 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2053 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2909 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 10.6 L/100km |