2005 Lincoln Aviator vs. 1987 Oldsmobile Aerotech

To start off, 2005 Lincoln Aviator is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Oldsmobile Aerotech. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Oldsmobile Aerotech would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Lincoln Aviator is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lincoln Aviator weights approximately 1629 kg more than 1987 Oldsmobile Aerotech.

Because 2005 Lincoln Aviator is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1987 Oldsmobile Aerotech. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Lincoln Aviator will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Lincoln Aviator 1987 Oldsmobile Aerotech
Make Lincoln Oldsmobile
Model Aviator Aerotech
Year Released 2005 1987
Body Type SUV Coupe
Engine Position Front Middle
Engine Size 4605 cc 2000 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 302 HP 0 HP
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Number of Seats 6 seats 1 seats
Vehicle Weight 2355 kg 726 kg
Vehicle Length 4920 mm 4810 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1910 mm
Vehicle Height 1830 mm 1060 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]