2005 Lincoln Aviator vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2005 Lincoln Aviator is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Lincoln Aviator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lincoln Aviator (302 HP) has 203 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lincoln Aviator should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lincoln Aviator weights approximately 1010 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Lincoln Aviator is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Mazda CU-X. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Lincoln Aviator will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lincoln Aviator (407 Nm) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (240 Nm). This means 2005 Lincoln Aviator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Lincoln Aviator | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
| Make | Lincoln | Mazda |
| Model | Aviator | CU-X |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1970 cc |
| Horse Power | 302 HP | 99 HP |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2355 kg | 1345 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 80 L |
