2005 Lincoln Aviator vs. 2001 Opel Omega
To start off, 2005 Lincoln Aviator is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Opel Omega would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Lincoln Aviator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lincoln Aviator (302 HP) has 160 more horse power than 2001 Opel Omega. (142 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lincoln Aviator should accelerate faster than 2001 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lincoln Aviator weights approximately 456 kg more than 2001 Opel Omega. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lincoln Aviator (407 Nm) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Opel Omega. (209 Nm). This means 2005 Lincoln Aviator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Lincoln Aviator | 2001 Opel Omega | |
Make | Lincoln | Opel |
Model | Aviator | Omega |
Year Released | 2005 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 302 HP | 142 HP |
Torque | 407 Nm | 209 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 94.6 mm |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2190 kg | 1734 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 75 L |