2005 Lincoln Aviator vs. 2011 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2011 Cadillac CTS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Lincoln Aviator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Lincoln Aviator would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Lincoln Aviator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Cadillac CTS (304 HP) has 2 more horse power than 2005 Lincoln Aviator. (302 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2005 Lincoln Aviator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lincoln Aviator weights approximately 433 kg more than 2011 Cadillac CTS.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lincoln Aviator (407 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Cadillac CTS. (370 Nm). This means 2005 Lincoln Aviator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Lincoln Aviator | 2011 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Lincoln | Cadillac |
Model | Aviator | CTS |
Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 302 HP | 304 HP |
Torque | 407 Nm | 370 Nm |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2190 kg | 1757 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1473 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 68 L |