2005 Lincoln Aviator vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Lincoln Aviator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Lincoln Aviator would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V (548 HP) has 246 more horse power than 2005 Lincoln Aviator. (302 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 2005 Lincoln Aviator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lincoln Aviator weights approximately 442 kg more than 2013 Cadillac CTS-V.
Because 2005 Lincoln Aviator is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Cadillac CTS-V. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Lincoln Aviator will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V (747 Nm) has 340 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Lincoln Aviator. (407 Nm). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Lincoln Aviator.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Lincoln Aviator | 2013 Cadillac CTS-V | |
Make | Lincoln | Cadillac |
Model | Aviator | CTS-V |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 302 HP | 548 HP |
Torque | 407 Nm | 747 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90.1 mm | 103 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 9.1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2355 kg | 1913 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4788 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1884 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1422 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 68 L |