2005 Lincoln LS vs. 1954 Studebaker Commander
To start off, 2005 Lincoln LS is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Studebaker Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Studebaker Commander would be higher. At 3,932 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lincoln LS (280 HP) has 140 more horse power than 1954 Studebaker Commander. (140 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1954 Studebaker Commander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lincoln LS weights approximately 291 kg more than 1954 Studebaker Commander. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Lincoln LS | 1954 Studebaker Commander | |
Make | Lincoln | Studebaker |
Model | LS | Commander |
Year Released | 2005 | 1954 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3932 cc | 3673 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 280 HP | 140 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 90.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 71.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 7.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1711 kg | 1420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 5200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3070 mm |