2005 Lincoln LS vs. 1956 Alfa Romeo 1900
To start off, 2005 Lincoln LS is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Alfa Romeo 1900. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Alfa Romeo 1900 would be higher. At 2,964 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lincoln LS (232 HP) has 118 more horse power than 1956 Alfa Romeo 1900. (114 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1956 Alfa Romeo 1900. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lincoln LS weights approximately 737 kg more than 1956 Alfa Romeo 1900. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Lincoln LS | 1956 Alfa Romeo 1900 | |
Make | Lincoln | Alfa Romeo |
Model | LS | 1900 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2964 cc | 1974 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 232 HP | 114 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 84.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 88 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1687 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3020 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 71 L |