2005 Lincoln LS vs. 1957 Seat 600
To start off, 2005 Lincoln LS is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Seat 600 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2005 Lincoln LS (280 HP) has 261 more horse power than 1957 Seat 600. (19 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1957 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lincoln LS weights approximately 1136 kg more than 1957 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lincoln LS (388 Nm) has 348 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Seat 600. (40 Nm). This means 2005 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Lincoln LS | 1957 Seat 600 | |
Make | Lincoln | Seat |
Model | LS | 600 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1957 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 280 HP | 19 HP |
Torque | 388 Nm | 40 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1711 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2010 mm |