2005 Lincoln LS vs. 1963 Lotus Seven
To start off, 2005 Lincoln LS is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 3,931 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lincoln LS (280 HP) has 242 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Seven. (38 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lincoln LS weights approximately 1281 kg more than 1963 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Lincoln LS | 1963 Lotus Seven | |
Make | Lincoln | Lotus |
Model | LS | Seven |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3931 cc | 997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 280 HP | 38 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1711 kg | 430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 29 L |