2005 Lincoln LS vs. 1963 Triumph Herald
To start off, 2005 Lincoln LS is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lincoln LS (232 HP) has 194 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Herald. (38 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lincoln LS weights approximately 907 kg more than 1963 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lincoln LS (299 Nm) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph Herald. (83 Nm). This means 2005 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Lincoln LS | 1963 Triumph Herald | |
| Make | Lincoln | Triumph |
| Model | LS | Herald |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1147 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 232 HP | 38 HP |
| Torque | 299 Nm | 83 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 69.3 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 76 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1687 kg | 780 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2320 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 29 L |
