2005 Lincoln LS vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2005 Lincoln LS is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,964 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lincoln LS (232 HP) has 143 more horse power than 1964 Triumph 2000. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lincoln LS weights approximately 517 kg more than 1964 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lincoln LS (298 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm). This means 2005 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Lincoln LS | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Lincoln | Triumph |
Model | LS | 2000 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2964 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 232 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 298 Nm | 158 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1687 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3020 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 64 L |