2005 Lincoln LS vs. 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2005 Lincoln LS is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 7,446 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 69 kg more than 2005 Lincoln LS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Lincoln LS | 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Lincoln | Oldsmobile |
| Model | LS | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3931 cc | 7446 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 280 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1711 kg | 1780 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2960 mm |
