2005 Lincoln LS vs. 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2005 Lincoln LS is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 7,462 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lincoln LS (280 HP) has 32 more horse power than 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (248 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 89 kg more than 2005 Lincoln LS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass (502 Nm) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Lincoln LS. (388 Nm). This means 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Lincoln LS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Lincoln LS | 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Lincoln | Oldsmobile |
| Model | LS | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3932 cc | 7462 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 280 HP | 248 HP |
| Torque | 388 Nm | 502 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1711 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 5270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2850 mm |
