2005 Lincoln LS vs. 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 2005 Lincoln LS is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 3,931 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lincoln LS (280 HP) has 205 more horse power than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. (75 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lincoln LS weights approximately 681 kg more than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lincoln LS (388 Nm) has 271 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. (117 Nm). This means 2005 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Lincoln LS | 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
Make | Lincoln | Mitsubishi |
Model | LS | Sigma |
Year Released | 2005 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3931 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 280 HP | 75 HP |
Torque | 388 Nm | 117 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1711 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2520 mm |