2005 Lincoln LS vs. 1981 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 2005 Lincoln LS is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lincoln LS (232 HP) has 128 more horse power than 1981 Mazda RX-7. (104 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1981 Mazda RX-7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lincoln LS weights approximately 627 kg more than 1981 Mazda RX-7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lincoln LS (298 Nm) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Mazda RX-7. (145 Nm). This means 2005 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Lincoln LS | 1981 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Lincoln | Mazda |
Model | LS | RX-7 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1981 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 232 HP | 104 HP |
Torque | 298 Nm | 145 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1687 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 65 L |