2005 Lincoln LS vs. 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2005 Lincoln LS is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,964 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lincoln LS weights approximately 367 kg more than 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2005 Lincoln LS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Lincoln LS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Lincoln LS | 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Lincoln | Oldsmobile |
Model | LS | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2005 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2964 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 232 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1687 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3020 mm | 2680 mm |