2005 Lincoln LS vs. 1992 Plymouth Colt

To start off, 2005 Lincoln LS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Plymouth Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Plymouth Colt would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lincoln LS (232 HP) has 121 more horse power than 1992 Plymouth Colt. (111 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1992 Plymouth Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lincoln LS weights approximately 462 kg more than 1992 Plymouth Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 Lincoln LS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Lincoln LS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Plymouth Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lincoln LS (298 Nm) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Plymouth Colt. (157 Nm). This means 2005 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Plymouth Colt.

Compare all specifications: