2005 Lincoln LS vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 2005 Lincoln LS is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 3,931 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 125 kg more than 2005 Lincoln LS.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Lincoln LS | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
Make | Lincoln | Mitsubishi |
Model | LS | Challenger |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3931 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 280 HP | 0 HP |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1711 kg | 1836 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2730 mm |