2005 Lincoln LS vs. 1997 Mitsubishi Colt

To start off, 2005 Lincoln LS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 3,931 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lincoln LS (280 HP) has 206 more horse power than 1997 Mitsubishi Colt. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1997 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lincoln LS weights approximately 766 kg more than 1997 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 Lincoln LS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Lincoln LS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lincoln LS (388 Nm) has 280 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Mitsubishi Colt. (108 Nm). This means 2005 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Mitsubishi Colt.

Compare all specifications: