2005 Lincoln LS vs. 1998 Acura CL
To start off, 2005 Lincoln LS is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Acura CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Acura CL would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lincoln LS (232 HP) has 32 more horse power than 1998 Acura CL. (200 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1998 Acura CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lincoln LS weights approximately 107 kg more than 1998 Acura CL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Lincoln LS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Lincoln LS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Lincoln LS | 1998 Acura CL | |
Make | Lincoln | Acura |
Model | LS | CL |
Year Released | 2005 | 1998 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 232 HP | 200 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1687 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4826 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1389 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2715 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 65 L |