2005 Lincoln LS vs. 2008 Mazda 6
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Lincoln LS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Lincoln LS would be higher. At 2,964 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lincoln LS weights approximately 333 kg more than 2008 Mazda 6.
Because 2005 Lincoln LS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Lincoln LS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lincoln LS (298 Nm) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 6. (207 Nm). This means 2005 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Lincoln LS | 2008 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Lincoln | Mazda |
Model | LS | 6 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2964 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 232 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 298 Nm | 207 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 87.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.6:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1687 kg | 1354 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3020 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 64 L |