2005 Lincoln LS vs. 2012 Hyundai i20
To start off, 2012 Hyundai i20 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Lincoln LS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Lincoln LS would be higher. At 2,964 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lincoln LS (232 HP) has 133 more horse power than 2012 Hyundai i20. (99 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 2012 Hyundai i20.
Because 2005 Lincoln LS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Lincoln LS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Hyundai i20, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lincoln LS (298 Nm) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Hyundai i20. (220 Nm). This means 2005 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Hyundai i20.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Lincoln LS | 2012 Hyundai i20 | |
Make | Lincoln | Hyundai |
Model | LS | i20 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2964 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 232 HP | 99 HP |
Torque | 298 Nm | 220 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 17:01 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3020 mm | 2525 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.1 L/100km | 3.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 5.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |