2005 Lincoln Town Car vs. 2010 Daewoo Tocsa
To start off, 2010 Daewoo Tocsa is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Lincoln Town Car. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Lincoln Town Car would be higher. At 4,603 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Lincoln Town Car is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lincoln Town Car (239 HP) has 86 more horse power than 2010 Daewoo Tocsa. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lincoln Town Car should accelerate faster than 2010 Daewoo Tocsa.
Because 2005 Lincoln Town Car is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Lincoln Town Car. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Daewoo Tocsa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lincoln Town Car (389 Nm) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Daewoo Tocsa. (237 Nm). This means 2005 Lincoln Town Car will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Daewoo Tocsa.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Lincoln Town Car | 2010 Daewoo Tocsa | |
Make | Lincoln | Daewoo |
Model | Town Car | Tocsa |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4603 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 239 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 389 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5480 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |